Legal Opinion

Pacific Pines Construction Corporation v. Young

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a suit for an injunction to restrain defendant from violating a contract. Plaintiff appeals from a decree dismissing the suit after a demurrer had been sustained to plaintiff’s third amended complaint and plaintiff had declined to plead further.

The sole issue to be decided is whether the contract was invalid upon the ground that it was lacking in consideration and in mutuality of obligation.

The contract, dated December 9, 1968, recited that plaintiff was engaged in the construction of homes and desired to obtain the exclusive services of defendant, dba “Northwest Designers,” to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Medak v. HekimianOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lemler v. BordOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Corbitt & Macleay v. Salem Gaslight Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Torrance v. Aames Funding Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  2. Local 3-7, International Woodworkers of America v. Daw Forest Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Jackson Hole Builders v. PirosWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API