Commonwealth v. DeMarco
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The Commonwealth claims that the judge erred in granting the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty one week after the plea was accepted and a sentence imposed. We agree.
Once accepted, “[a] plea of guilty differs in purpose and effect from a mere admission or an extra-judicial confession; it is itself a conviction. . . . More is not required; the court has nothing to do but give judgment and sentence.” Machi-broda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 493 (1962), quoting Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220, 223 (1927). See Durant v. United States, 410 F.2d 689, 691 (1st Cir. 1969).…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. John L. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- William R. Durant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ComitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FanelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. CorreaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. NolanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.