Legal Opinion

Clement A. Tavares and Alice B. Tavares v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1974No. 72-1427PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants-taxpayers protest the levy of the Internal Revenue Service upon bank accounts pursuant to notice of assessment following deficiency notice, all strictly in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6331. Appellants contend that Sniadach v. Family Finance Corporation, 395 U.S. 337, 89 S.Ct. 1820, 23 L.Ed.2d 349 (1969), requires that a judicial hearing be had prior to the taking of their property. The District Court ruled against this contention and granted summary judgment for the United States. We affirm.

The issue is foreclosed by Phillips v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 283 U.S. 589, 51…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Towe Antique Ford Foundation, a Nonprofit Montana Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service Department of Treasury United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Margarito Martinez, Patricia Martinez v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Western Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Ginter v. SouthernCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API