Legal Opinion

Margarito Martinez, Patricia Martinez v. Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1984No. 84-1384PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs’ tax refund suit.

Plaintiff taxpayers petitioned the district court for a refund of an income tax penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6702 for filing their federal income tax return for fiscal year 1982 without providing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Kenneth v. Stillhammer and Laverne B. StillhammerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Clement A. Tavares and Alice B. Tavares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Whitney v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Michael W. Lovell and Phyllis D. Lovell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Laura Ann Morris v. Adams-Millis Corporation, Michael T. Braswell, Attorney ForCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API