Margarito Martinez, Patricia Martinez v. Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs’ tax refund suit.
Plaintiff taxpayers petitioned the district court for a refund of an income tax penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6702 for filing their federal income tax return for fiscal year 1982 without providing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Kenneth v. Stillhammer and Laverne B. StillhammerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Clement A. Tavares and Alice B. Tavares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Whitney v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Michael W. Lovell and Phyllis D. Lovell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Laura Ann Morris v. Adams-Millis Corporation, Michael T. Braswell, Attorney ForCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.