Legal Opinion

State v. Short

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2011No. 2006-1366PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by defendant-appellant, Duane Short. A jury found Short guilty of the aggravated murders of Rhonda Short and Donnie Sweeney. He was sentenced to death for both offenses.

Factual Background

{¶ 2} Evidence introduced at trial showed that Duane and Rhonda Short were married and lived on Staton Street in Lemon Township, Middletown, Ohio, with their three children, Justin, Tiffany, and Jesse (born in 1990, 1992, and 1995 respectively). Short worked as a meat cutter for McGee Supermarket.

{¶ 3} There was testimony at trial that Rhonda Short attended church and…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Mammone (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ShortOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API