Legal Opinion

Norwegian Plow Co. v. Bellon

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Hutchinson county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action in claim and delivery by the Norwegian Plow Company against David Bellon and F. M. Hennis. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, P. J.

From the record we find that this is an action in claim and delivery, wherein the plaintiff alleges in its complaint that the defendants wrongfully took from its possession and detain from it certain personal property of which it claims to be the owner. The defendants, who were at the commencement of this action, and prior thereto, respectively the sheriff and deputy sheriff of Hutchinson county, justify the taking and holding of the property by virtue of three writs of at*385tachments which were sued out in three several actions commenced by three parties against H. H. Miller & Son, and who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Goodman v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Easter v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Dows v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Hume v. TuftsIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stephens v. FausSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mettel v. GalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Taylor v. Bank of VolgaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sinkling v. Illinois Central Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API