Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Faus

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hughes County. Hon. Lortng E. GaRRy, Judge. Action by Louis L- Stephens against Oliver H. P. Eaus. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This is an action to compel the specific performance of a contract relating to- real propert}''. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant was the owner of a certain described tract of land in Hughes county; that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the defendant agreed to- convey the land by warrant)^ deed, free from all incumbrances, to the plaintiff, and the-plaintiff agreed tO' pay therefor the sum of $500; that the defendant,, though requested, has failed and refused to conve)'; and that the plaintiff is still ready and willing to pa3r for the property. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gade v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hawkins v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Evenson v. WebsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Martin v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Brady v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dring v. St. Lawrence TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Foss v. SpitznagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lyle v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API