Legal Opinion

Linck v. City of Litchfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Montgomery county; the Hon. Louis Allen, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The writ of error in this case brings up for review the proceedings of the County Court of Montgomery county, in relation to the assessment and collection of a special tax for a local improvement, consisting of grading, paving and otherwise improving a portion of Ryder street in the city of Litchfield. It appears that, at the April term, 1890, of said court, said city filed its petition, representing, in substance, that the petitioner was a municipal corporation existing under a special charter granted by the Legislature; that on the 10th day of July, 1884, the city council of said city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shreve v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Martin v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Taylor v. HatchNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  4. Gilmore v. HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. People ex rel. Huck v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Home Telephone Co. v. People's Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Richter v. BurdockIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ramsay Motor Co. v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Horkey v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Komorowski v. Boston Store of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API