Legal Opinion

Richter v. Burdock

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Writ or Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Turnbaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

This was an action of the fourth class, brought by defendant in error in the municipal court of the city of Chicago to recover for usury, attorney’s fees and court costs, alleged to have been involuntarily paid to plaintiff in error by defendant in error.

It appears from the evidence that on July 12, 1911, the plaintiff in error loaned defendant in error $600, for which defendant in error gave his two notes, one for the sum of $500, payable on or before January 15, 1912, and the other for $300, payable ninety-three days after date. Both notes were to draw interest after maturity, but no rate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. ReevesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Marshall v. SillimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Baum v. ThomsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Galpin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Wheaton v. HibbardNew York Supreme Court · 1822

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People ex rel. Kane v. WeisIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. People ex rel. Gibbons v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. National Trust & Credit Co. v. F. H. Orcutt & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API