Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. Falcone

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 12, 1991No. 89-5718PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Daniel Enrique Laetividal-Gonzalez, A/K/A "Ki Ki" and Gonzalo Ocampo, United States of America v. Shirley Brown, United States of America v. Luis Felipe Gonzalez, United States of America v. Luis Miguel Rosares-Martinez, Gonzalo Ocampo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Maria L. SayanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Andrew MenichinoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. NederCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Roger BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API