Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Menichino
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 23, 1993No. 91-3765PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Menichino was convicted of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, wire fraud, and mail fraud, and three substantive counts of wire fraud.
Menichino wanted to sell his 55-foot power boat and negotiated with undercover investigating agents for that purpose. The evidence was sufficient to show the following. Menichino represented to agent Carroll that the boat was worth no more than $250,000 and that Carroll could buy it for $240,000. Carroll asked Menichino if Meni-chino could obtain an appraisal valuing the boat at $350,000. The appraisal would be used by Carroll to secure a bank loan of 80% of that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Alfred James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Sharon Kay JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard S. HoliusaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Salomon S. LoayzaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.