Legal Opinion
Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 15, 2006No. Civil Action 04-1991 (RMU)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). The plaintiff asks the court to vacate its July 17, 2006 order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. She argues that the court erroneously ruled that the plaintiffs Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., claims are time-barred. 1 Because the plaintiff had notice of her claims on or before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Alston v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Floyd v. LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Bronner v. DugganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.