Legal Opinion

Holliston Mills of Tennessee v. McGuffin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal in error from a judgment in the Kingsport Law Court for $1,000 in favor of John McGuffin based on the second ground of a declaration charging violation of Code, Sections 5338, 5339 and 5340, which were originally Sections 8, 9 and 10 of Chapter 110, Public Acts of 1919, known as the workshop and factory statutes. The specific violation charged was the failure of the defendant Holliston Mills to install and maintain such ventilation machinery, such as fans, blowers, etc., as would protect its employees, and particularly John McGuffin, plaintiff below, from the injurious…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  5. Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. Federal Express Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Kingsport v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. Stephens v. Crane Trucking, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. First Suburban Water Utility Dist. v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Goodall Co. v. SartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API