Legal Opinion
City of Peru v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 27, 1988No. 3-87-0189PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The respondent, Peru Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 137 (Union), filed a petition with the respondent, Illinois State Labor Relations Board (Board), seeking to represent a bargaining unit composed of police officers in the City of Peru below the rank of chief, i.e., four lieutenants, two sergeants and 13 patrolmen. The Board’s hearing officer concluded that the four lieutenants and two sergeants are supervisors as defined by the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, par. 1603(r)) (Act), and therefore, cannot be included in the bargaining unit. In a 2 to 1…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Rockford Township Highway Department v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Arizona Public Service Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Eastern Greyhound Lines, (A Division of the Greyhound Corporation) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Chief Judge of the Circuit Court v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31, AFL-CIOIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State PanelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Village of Hazel Crest v. Illinois Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Petition of AFSCME, Local 490Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.