Legal Opinion

Phoenix Indemnity Insurance v. Pulis

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 25,978PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Chief Justice.

{1} Appellants Larry and Lynette Pulis appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company. Phoenix filed a complaint for declaratory relief alleging that Lynette Pulis’s minor son, Steven, was not entitled to class-one uninsured motorist (UM) coverage for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The Pulises counterclaimed. The Pulises and Phoenix both moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Phoenix’s motion on the basis that the endorsed named-driverexelusion provision in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Romero v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rodriguez v. Windsor InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  5. Bird v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API