Mullican v. State

OPINION

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Appellant Cliff Neal Mullican appeals his conviction for possession and promotion of child pornography. In a single point, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Appellant argues that the trial court should have suppressed the pornographic images of children taken from his computer because they were personal writings not subject to seizure with an eviden-tiary search warrant. We will affirm.

In October 2003, a detective from the New York Police Department’s Computer Investigation and Technology Unit notified the Texas…