Legal Opinion
Feinberg v. Enselberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to require the respondent, as Treasurer of Boulevard Sanitarium Corporation, to deliver a financial statement to petitioners as stockholders, in accordance with the provisions of section 77 of the Stock Corporation Law. The respondent contends that the petition is insufficient on its face, and in any event shows that a statement as required by the aforesaid statute was prepared and forwarded to the petitioners, a copy of which is annexed to the petition as Schedule B.
*359The respondent, by his attorneys, has served his answer to the petition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dyker Heights Home for Blind Children, Inc. v. StolitzkyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Daddazio v. Ontario Sand & Gravel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Daddazio v. Ontario Sand & Gravel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dernell v. Steel Partitions, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1952