Legal Opinion
Daddazio v. Ontario Sand & Gravel Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLapham, J.
This is a motion by the defendant to change the venue of this action from Monroe county to the county of Ontario on the ground that under subdivision 1 of section 184 of the Civil Practice Act, Ontario county is the proper county for trial. The action is brought by a stockholder of the defendant company to recover the penalties under section 77 of the Stock Corporation Law for the failure of the treasurer of the defendant to comply with the request of the plaintiff for a particular account of all its assets and liabilities.
The complaint alleges that on November 1, 1939, the plaintiff served a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Osborne v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Troughton v. GraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Dairymen's League Co-operative Ass'n v. Brockway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Strope v. Albany Steel & Iron Supply Co., New York County Courts1937
- Strope v. Albany Steel & Iron Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daddazio v. Ontario Sand & Gravel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Dernell v. Steel Partitions, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1952
- Feinberg v. EnselbergNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Engelhard v. Spadea Fashions, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1952