Legal Opinion
Mattie Holland Dan Holland v. Daren Roeser City of Portland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1994No. 92-35536PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
The City of Portland appeals the district court’s amended order awarding plaintiffs attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Federal Ride of Civil Procedure 68. The district court awarded attorney’s fees for the time plaintiffs’ attorney spent prior to the City’s offer of judgment as well as for time spent preparing the fee petition after the plaintiffs accepted the offer of judgment. We affirm.
I
The City of Portland towed and impounded Mattie and Dan Holland’s car. At a subsequent administrative tow hearing, a city hearings officer invalidated the tow and ordered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clark v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Herrington v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hall v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Gates v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Virginia Espinoza Guerrero Marcos Albert Guerrero v. William Cummings City of NyssaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- David Hooks v. Landmark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Roberta Miller v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.