Legal Opinion

Roberta Miller v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2017No. 14-35783PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Roberta Miller appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for attorney’s fees. Miller sued the City of Portland (“Portland”) and three Portland police officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for asserted Fourth Amendment violations. Portland made a Rule 68 Offer of Judgment (the “Rule 68 Offer” or “Offer”) for $1,000, plus reasonable attorney’s fees to be determined by the district court. Miller timely accepted the Offer. When Miller moved for fees, however, the district court denied the motion on the ground that the $1,000 award was a de minimis judgment under 42…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lillian Corder, Roberta Lombardo v. Brad Gates, Sheriff, and Roy Brown, Lillian Corder Roberta Lombardo v. Brad Gates, Sheriff Roy BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Clark v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Mendez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Robert Kubiak v. County of RavalliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Dartez v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. Bret Bailey v. Mount Diablo Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Collaborative Continuing Educ. v. Starks Realty Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Craig v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API