Legal Opinion
Baird v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1952No. Civ. 4334PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant owned and occupied a frame residence located within Eire Zone I of the city of Porterville. This building, which was some 50 years old, was damaged by fire on March 20, 1949.
This action was brought to enforce the provisions of a city ordinance prohibiting the erection of frame buildings in this zone, and requiring that alterations or repairs to a building so situated, which exceeded 50 per cent of the value of the existing building, should be made to conform to all of the requirements for new buildings as provided in the city building code adopted by ordinance, and as provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ex parte FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- McCloskey v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Maguire v. ReardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knapp v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Covenant Harbor Bible Camp v. SteinkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Kettering v. Lamar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Perepletchikoff v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Del Pino v. GualtieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.