Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Hartman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 28, 1988No. 69243, 70377PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
519 So.2d 606 (1988)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Gregory S. HARTMAN, Respondent.
Nos. 69243, 70377.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 28, 1988.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Thomas E. DeBerg, Asst. Staff Counsel and David R. Ristoff, Branch Staff Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
Gregory S. Hartman, Sarasota, in pro. per.
2Per curiam
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee's report. The Bar has filed a petition for review, contesting the referee's recommended discipline as too lenient. We have…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- The Florida Bar v. BreedSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- The Florida Bar v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- The Florida Bar v. LarkinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
4Cited by7 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. SchillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TaulerSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- The Florida Bar v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. McShirleySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- The Florida Bar v. KassierSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.