Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 20, 1978No. 52894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

361 So.2d 159 (1978)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Roger L. DAVIS, Respondent.

No. 52894.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 20, 1978.

John Hume, Bar Counsel, Ft. Lauderdale, and James P. Hollaway, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant.

Roger L. Davis, in pro per.

2Per curiam

Respondent, Roger L. Davis, is a member of The Florida Bar and subject to the disciplinary measures of this court. Article V, Section 15, Florida Constitution. Based upon the findings of the Referee, we suspend Mr. Davis from the practice of law for a period of twelve months.

Respondent was charged with the following:

COUNT I

Conduct…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re LaMotteSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. The Florida Bar v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. The Florida Bar v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Florida Bar v. DingleSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Florida Bar v. BudzinskiSupreme Court of Florida · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. VannierSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Florida Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. The Florida Bar v. BaumanSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. The Florida Bar v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. The Florida Bar v. KassierSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API