Legal Opinion

State v. Stice

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 28, 1975No. 1 CA-CR 887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

This is a petition for review under Rule 32.9(c), 1973 Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., of the actions of the trial court in denying petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32.1, ibid., and in denying his motion for rehearing thereof.

Petitioner has complied with the requirements of Rule 32.9 so as to permit review by this Court of the trial court’s actions. The granting of a petition for review by this Court in such a case is discretionary. Rule 32.9(c). This Court, in its discretion, has granted review in this case, and after…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WhippleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. State v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State v. TappCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API