Legal Opinion

State v. Stice

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 16, 1975No. 1 CA-CR 887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

In our prior opinion in this matter, State v. Stice, 23 Ariz.App. 97, 530 P.2d 1130 (1975), we held that the trial court correctly denied petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief, and therefore we denied his petition for review. Upon further consideration after the filing of petitioner’s motion for rehearing, we have decided that the matter must be remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.

The petition for post-conviction relief was filed pursuant to the provisions of Rule 32.1(f), seeking an order from the trial court allowing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. State v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CaraballoHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. State v. TappCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. State v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API