Legal Opinion

Ford, Powell & Carson, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 29, 1983No. 386-82CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHITE, Senior Judge.

This is an action to recover $188,415.19, plus interest, allegedly due Ford, Powell & Carson, Inc. (“the plaintiff”) in accordance with the provisions of a contract between the plaintiff and the United States.

The defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that, in view of 28 U.S.C. § 2517(a), as amended by section 139(k)(l) of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982 (Pub.L. 97-164, 96 Stat. 25, 43), this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the present action.

The statutory provision relied on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Fritz Kyer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Breitbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolverine Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  2. Aaron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  3. El-Sheikh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API