Legal Opinion

Wolverine Supply, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 13, 1989No. 21-89CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in this contract case on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim since the contract upon which plaintiff’s claim rests was between plaintiff and a nonappropriated fund instrumentality (NAFI) of the United States Government. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s motion. Upon consideration of the submissions of the parties, oral argument having been waived by the parties, the court finds merit in defendant’s motion.

I

On July 6, 1988, Detachment 1, 5000 Contracting Squadron, Eielson Air Force Base…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Furash & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. McDonald Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Ains, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API