Legal Opinion

Aaron v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 8, 1992No. 92-311CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies defendant’s motion.

FACTS

This case is a class-action suit brought by civilian and military employees and their dependents to recover fees paid to the Headquarters, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army (“USAREUR”) Vehicle Registration Fund (“VRF”). The three named plaintiffs represent persons who have paid licensing or vehicle registration fees in the Federal Republic of Germany and Berlin, and later in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siegal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Alder Terrace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Southern Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. El-Sheikh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API