Money Store Investment Corp. v. Southern California Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’LEARY, J.
The Money Store Investment Corporation (the Money Store) appeals the judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Southern California Bank (the Bank), contending there was a triable issue of fact concerning the Bank’s disbursal of loan proceeds contrary to the Money Store’s instructions in an escrow transaction. We reverse with directions.
Robert McKinley contracted with Teddy Springfield to buy Springfield’s chiropractic practice. To facilitate the purchase, Springfield and McKinley entered into an escrow with the Bank. The escrow instructions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- WYDA Associates v. MernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Summit Financial Holdings, Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Fleet v. Bank of America CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Orlando Millenia, LC v. United Title Services of Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.