Legal Opinion
Yakima Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Henneford
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1936No. 26010. En BancPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, C. J.
Defendant members of the state tax commission appeal from a decree of the superior court for Thurston county which enjoins the defendants from enforcing against plaintiffs the occupational tax imposed by Title II, chapter 180, Laws of 1935, p. 709 (Bern. 1935 Sup., §8370-4 [P. C. §7030-64] et seq.). All of the respondents are domestic corporations. The facts will be stated only as to one of the respondents, that of the Yakima County Horticultural Union, inasmuch as their plan of organization and method of doing business are substantially the same.
The Yakima County Horticultural Union has a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yakima Fruit Growers Ass'n v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Pease v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Unemployment Compensation Department v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Farmers Oil Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.