Legal Opinion

City Gas Co. v. Poudre

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 14, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action of trespass on the case was brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant Gas Company damages for its alleged *225wrongful act in having him arrested. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against the defendant, which is now to be reviewed.

The first assignment of error is that the lower court declined to permit the defendant to introduce any evidence, because no grounds of defense had been filed, although the general issue had been pleaded, and the plaintiff had replied generally thereto.

Bill of exceptions No. 1, which embodies the defendant’s objection to this action of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  2. Chestnut v. ChestnutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Colby v. ReamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Duncan v. CarsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Southern Passenger Motor Lines, Inc. v. BurksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Trotman v. TrotmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Whitley v. Booker Brick Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API