Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Booker Brick Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 14, 1912PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Newport News, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment. Judgment for the plaintiff. * Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This is a proceeding by motion, under Virginia Code 1904, section 3211, to recover $490.95; $286.05, part thereof, was evidenced by open account for the sale of bricks, and the residue by note, subject to a payment of $40.00.

The plaintiff in error, the defendant in the trial court, admitted the plaintiff’s claim to the extent of $150.95, and as to the residue pleaded non-assumpsit, to which the plaintiff replied generally, and the issue thus made was submitted to a jury.

The president of the plaintiff company, having testified to the correctness of the demand, was asked on cross-examination if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carr v. Meade's Ex'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  2. Bunch's Ex'or v. Fluvanna CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  3. Hall v. RatliffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Preston v. Salem Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Liskey v. PaulSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Powell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Sutherland v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Keister's Executors v. Philips'Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Emerald Point, LLC v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API