Legal Opinion

Wilkey v. State Ex Rel. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1939No. 6 Div. 394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

This is a statutory quo warranto under Paragraph (1) of Section 9932 of the-Code of 1923. The count or amended information charges that the respondents engaged in practicing law without a license. The respondents by pleas 1 and 2 set up the general issue or denial of the allegations arid the trial court sustained demurrer to these pleas. In this, there was error.

The gravamen of the charge was the unlawful practice of law. If they did not practice law as charged, they would not be guilty, whether they had a license or not, and unless this fact was established the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. State ex rel. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Berk v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Michael v. State ex rel. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Interstate Electric Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. West End v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dauphin County Bar Ass'n v. MazzacaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Wilkey v. State Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Ancora Corp. v. Miller Oil Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Dauphin County Bar Ass'n v. MazzacaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API