Legal Opinion
Interstate Electric Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 8, 1934No. 6 Div. 417PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The suit is on a fidelity bond (Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 223 Ala. 385, 136 So. 800; 25 Corpus Juris 1088), wherein plaintiff seeks to recover for loss alleged to have been suffered arising from; the want of honesty or fidelity of one Daniel, •plaintiff’s “secretary-treasurer.”
The question here for determination is presented by the ruling on defendant’s pleas ■7 and 8. These pleas, setting up an estoppel by judgment, are in bar of plaintiff’s right of action, and, being sustained, .plaintiff took a nonsuit to review the ruling thereon. They…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Ferdon v. DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- AAA Equipment & Rental, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Griffin v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.