Legal Opinion
O'Clair v. Dumelle
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 21, 1990No. 88 C 8966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendants’, Frank Dumelle, III and Constance G. Dumelle (the “Dumelles”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 56(b) for summary judgment on the five count amended complaint of plaintiff, Debra O’Clair.
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, deposition, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Kahn v. James Burton Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williamson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Workman v. DinkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006