Legal Opinion

Neo Solar Power Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 1, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-111; Court 16-00088PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on plaintiff Neo Solar Power Corporation (“NSP”)’s motion for judgment on thé ageincy record pursuant to U.S. Court of International Trade Rule 56.1. Pl.’s Mot. for J. upon the Agency R. Pursuant to Rule 56.1, ECF’No. 30. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

NSP is a producer and exporter of certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic (“CSPV”) products from the Republic of China (“Taiwan”). Deck of Henry Chen in Supp. of Mot. for Prelim. .Inj. ¶4, ECF No. 6 (“Chen Deck”). On February 18, 2015, the U.S. Department of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Sterling Federal Systems, Inc. v. Daniel S. Goldin, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Jan Gerritsen and Johannes C.J. Aerts v. Shoji Shirai, Masakzu Fukushima, Satoru Miyamoto and Masahiro MiyazakiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API