Legal Opinion

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Essaghof

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 10, 2017No. AC38736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

In this foreclosure action, the defendants Roger Essaghof and Katherine Marr-Essaghof 1 appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, and from the court's entry of a posttrial financial order. The defendants claim that the court (1) erred in rejecting their special defenses of fraudulent inducement and unclean hands, and (2) abused its discretion in ordering them to reimburse the plaintiff for property taxes paid by the plaintiff during the pendency of this appeal. We affirm the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. 19 Perry Street, LLC v. Unionville Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. EssaghofConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API