Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Kingsbaker Bros. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1935No. L. A. 15422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment for breach of contract for the sale and purchase of a crop of Bartlett pears.

The questions presented upon appeal are mainly questions of fact. This court may not overthrow the judgment of the trial court in its decision on questions of fact unless there is a want of evidence to support the judgment.

The major question involved is whether the -pears which were sold under a certain contract met the requirements thereof as to size, quality, shape and condition, interpreted, of course, with a consideration of the general rules and customs which are commonly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville Packing Co. v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Morrison, McIntosh & Co. v. LeiserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API