Precision Erecting, Inc. v. Wokurka
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Presiding Judge.
Precision Erecting, Inc. ("Precision") 1 appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to set aside the partial default judgment entered against it, Precision raises the following (restated) issues for our review:
I. Whether the trial court erred when it entered a default judgment against Precision.
II. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to set aside the default judgment pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 60(B).
We affirm.
On January 28, 1998, Todd Wokurka ("Wo-kurka") filed a tort action against Precision and others for personal injuries he sustained in a work-related…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- LaPalme v. RomeroIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Glennar Mercury-Lincoln, Inc. v. RileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dade Erection Serv. v. Sims Crane Serv.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Buck v. P. J. T.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Volunteers of America v. Premier Auto Acceptance Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kelly v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Jostens Learning Corp. v. Education System Corp. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.