State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Krewson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and Woodrow W. Krewson’s motion to compel arbitration. For the reasons stated summary judgment is entered in favor of State Farm and against Krewson and Krewson’s motion to compel arbitration is denied.
Background
This case involves two related matters. State Farm v. Krewson, Civil Action No. 90-5490, is a action for declaratory judgment in which the plaintiff insurer seeks court determination of its obligations under certain clauses of an automobile insurance policy held by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. IlmonenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hertz Claim Management v. MarchettaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Bruce v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Knewson (Woodrow W.), Estate of Krewson (Matthew J.) Krewson (Woodrow W.) v. State Farm Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.