Legal Opinion
Joe Boxer Corp. v. Fritz Transp. Int'l
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 19, 1998No. CV 97-9083 LGB (Mcx)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND.
BAIRD, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Joe Boxer Corporation and Federal Insurance Company move for remand of this case. Plaintiffs’ Motion came on regularly for hearing on May 18, 1998. Having reviewed all pertinent papers on file and considered the arguments of counsel, for the reasons described below the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion.
II.PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Joe Boxer contracted with Defendants to ship some cotton yarn from Shanghai, China to Guatemala City, Guatemala via the port of Long Beach, California. (Comply…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Royal Insurance v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Project Hope v. M/V IBN SINADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Continental Insurance v. Kawasaki Kisen Kasha, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.