Legal Opinion
Entegris (Formerly Known as Mykrolis Corporation) v. Pall Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 13, 2007No. 2004-1440, 2005-1265, 2005-1266, 2006-1374PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Mykrolis Corporation (“Mykrolis”) 1 sued Pall Corporation (“Pall”) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,068,770 (the '770 patent) and 6,378,907 (the '907 patent) by certain fluid filtering devices manufactured and sold by Pall. The district court granted Mykrolis’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Mykrolis Corp. v. Pall Corp., No. 03-10392, 2004 WL 937330, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7523 (D.Mass. Apr. 30, 2004) (preliminary injunction order). After subsequent motions by the parties, the court…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Altana Pharma AG v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Advanced Fiber Technologies (AFT) Trust v. J & L Fiber Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Lowe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.