Legal Opinion

Racine County National Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1973No. 299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue before us is:

Was the loss sustained by the bank due to the nonpayment of the loan so as to bar the bank’s recovery under the loan exclusion clause contained in the bond?

The appellant argues that the bond covers the loss of surrendered securities because it was fraudulently induced to release them to Studey and because the securities were within the definition of property and covered by insuring clause (B). This contention is founded on the supposition that there is a difference between a loss due to nonpayment of a loan and a loss due to the fraudulent procurement of collateral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leatherman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. First National Bank of Crandon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. James Employees Credit Union v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Depositors Trust Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  5. Forest County v. United Surety Co. of BaltimoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Continental Corporation v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. State Bank of Viroqua v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Franklin National Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API