Legal Opinion

Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 1983No. 82-C-62PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this action on a contract of insurance. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum below, plaintiff’s motion is denied and defendant’s motion is granted.

Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332; the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.

The parties have submitted a thorough stipulation of facts which the Court adopts as its own statement of undisputed facts. A summary of the facts necessary for the decision in this matter follows:

FACTS

Plaintiff is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. WoodingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Bay Area Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
  3. NCNB NAT. BANK v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API