Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHABAZ, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this action on a contract of insurance. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum below, plaintiff’s motion is denied and defendant’s motion is granted.
Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332; the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.
The parties have submitted a thorough stipulation of facts which the Court adopts as its own statement of undisputed facts. A summary of the facts necessary for the decision in this matter follows:
FACTS
Plaintiff is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- State v. WoodingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Bay Area Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- NCNB NAT. BANK v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985