Legal Opinion
Sun Cosmetic Shoppe, Inc. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 1, 1949No. 21333_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment, summarily dismissing an amended complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that there was “no genuine issue as to any material fact”, in an action by the plaintiff for treble damages under the RobinsonPatman Act.1 The following facts, appearing in the complaint and the accompanying affidavits, are to be taken as true. The plaintiff is a New York corporation, doing business in the City of New York, and the defendant is a Delaware corporation, which until January 1st, 1948, was the sole distributor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3Cited by27 opinions
- Golf City, Inc., Cross v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- George Haug Co., Inc. v. Rolls Royce Motor Cars Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- FLM Collision Parts, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.