Legal Opinion

Eatmon v. Penland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1924No. 15026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, 0.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error, P. O. Eatmon, as plaintiff, in the county court of Jackson county, against J. H. Penland, Administrator of the estate of Martha C. • Eatmon, deceased, to recover a balance of $615, alleged to be due on a promissory ■ note executed and delivered by the said' Martha C. Eatmon during her lifetime to the plaintiff, P. O. Eatmon.

The defendant, in his amended answer, ■denied the execution of the note, and further alleged failure ’ of consideration. At the close of all the evidence the trial court sustained the motion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harper v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. StegallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hapke v. HapkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Johnson v. RudisillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Rieck v. Town of LongdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API