Eatmon v. Penland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, 0.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error, P. O. Eatmon, as plaintiff, in the county court of Jackson county, against J. H. Penland, Administrator of the estate of Martha C. • Eatmon, deceased, to recover a balance of $615, alleged to be due on a promissory ■ note executed and delivered by the said' Martha C. Eatmon during her lifetime to the plaintiff, P. O. Eatmon.
The defendant, in his amended answer, ■denied the execution of the note, and further alleged failure ’ of consideration. At the close of all the evidence the trial court sustained the motion of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harper v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. StegallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hapke v. HapkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Johnson v. RudisillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Rieck v. Town of LongdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964