Legal Opinion
White Castle System, Inc. v. Huntington National Bank
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1941No. 3307PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BARNES, J.
The above-entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of defendant’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.
Plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant on March 1, 1939. The same was attacked py motion and demurrer, as was the amended petition, resulting in the filing of a second amended petition on June 23, 1939.
Defendant’s answer'was attacked by motion, as was the amended answer, finally resulting in the filing of a second amended answer on April 17, 1940. In May following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- National Surety Co. v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Wussow v. Badger State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Herbel v. Peoples State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Sekerak v. National City BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Pavlovich v. National City BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Portsmouth Clay Products Co. v. National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.