Legal Opinion

Paul McKernan v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 28, 2017No. 14-4506PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, Paul McKernan contends that, because of the egregious advice given him by his counsel, he was deprived of the right to a fair trial before an impartial tribunal. He asserts that the judge in his murder trial was so concerned over what she considered to be “slanderous,” “hurtful,” and “terrible things” written about her on a website that she lost her ability to be impartial. He farther asserts that his counsel, unlike any competent counsel, failed to recognize this loss of impartiality and, in doing so, deprived him of the effective…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Von Davis v. Charlotte JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  2. Washington v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. BAKER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. BAKER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. Brandon S. Fournier v. Warden of SCI Benner Township, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API