Legal Opinion
Noland v. Wheatley
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 22, 1993No. 3:93-cv-00055PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on the motion of defendants William Wheatley, Sheriff of Wabash County, Edie Gidley, Sandy Nelson, Kevin Farr, and the Board of Commissioners of Wabash County to dismiss or, in the alternative, for qualified immunity. The defendants seek dismissal of plaintiff Larry Noland’s claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Indiana Jail Standards.
For the reasons that follow, the court finds that the defendants’ motion must be granted in part and denied in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Torcasio v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Little v. Lycoming CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kornblau v. Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Wagner v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.