Legal Opinion
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 7, 1991No. Civ. A. 83-C-0434, 89-C-0190PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This opinion addresses issues raised in the damages phase of a bifurcated patent infringement action. On March 22, 1983, Rite-Hite Corporation (“Rite-Hite”) commenced this action in which it alleges that Kelley Company, Inc.’s (“Kelley”) Truk Stop vehicle restraint infringed Rite-Hite’s U.S. Patent 4,373,847 (“the ’847 patent”). The ’847 patent was issued on February 15, 1983, and covers a device for restraining trucks to loading docks during the loading or unloading process.
This action was bifurcated for trial purposes. After a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Grain Processing Corporation v. American Maize-Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Minks v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Rite-Hite Corporation v. Kelley Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Total Containment, Inc. v. Environ Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.